Obama Campaign Proof of Caucus Fraud

Obama Campaign Proof of Caucus Fraud by A Silenced Voter

 It has long been whispered, discussed and screamed by some that fraud was taking place in caucuses by Obama campaign staffers. Recently I read an account from an eye witness to this fraud that took place in the Texas caucuses.

Many news pundits are asking "Why cant Obama close the deal?" could it be because primary votes are not as easily manipulated as caucus counts. Its hard to shout down a little old lady, from one report, if she is just standing in line to cast a private vote, and its also hard to 'steal' primary voting ballots unlike the reported theft of caucus convention packages and sign in sheets or to "take over" a polling station unlike the reported "take over" of caucuses with fabricated counts called in. Gee...... that sounds like something that would make Putin proud.

There is also the 'new' revelations of Rev. Wright and his horrid comments and there is the yet to be truly explored long term friendship with William "Bill" Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and the truly hidden ugliness of the combined friendships with William "Bill" Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama and Rashid and Mona Khalidi. This is an explosion waiting to happen, the republicans are just hoping it doesn't happen until the general election.

For all the above reasons and more he will never 'close the deal' in November 2008 and every single Super Delegate will be held responsible for another Republican in the White House.

Here is a link to a wonderful article by Pacific John about Eye witnessed Caucus Fraud

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/2/22818/72392

Below is a Video Showing Caucusing in action

Caucus with Obama by youtubes johnandrewp
"Caucuses are completely un-democratic. " by johnandrewp

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 
Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 5/4/2008 9:43 PM tayahtahme wrote:
    I KNEW IT I JUST KNEW!!!!!!!!!
    Reply to this
  • 5/5/2008 4:36 PM tayahtahme wrote:
    intimidation is no way to elect a president! I've always been against caucuses for this same reason. Obama was trying to force Michigan to caucus after the primary didst go his way. In real life that was intimidation plain and simple. In case anybody reading this doest understand let me tell you about Detroit. Anybody in the city of Detroit standing in a room and trying to vote for Hillary would have a life expectancy of about 20 minutes after leaving. I know some people will think this is a racist comment but truth is truth and facts are facts and as unpleasant as it may be this is the truth. Every vote counts count every vote. The real test of character is when your principles are put to the test and sticking to them is not to your personal benefits "voices must be heard" a principle Obama believes in or is it a cheap campaign slogan? Obama doesn't understand that by doing the right thing, you always benefit more in the long run than doing the wrong thing But a decision like this takes exceptional judgment, magnanimity, seeing things on a higher level, a plane where principle comes first and personal advantage comes second. In order for Obama to resolve this conflict which he could easily do, he would have to be all the things he actually claims to be, putting principle above his own political fortunes and the fact that he doesn't and wont, says more about who he really is and the hypocrisy of his campaign than anything anyone can say. his ambitions are more important than his principles and "voices must be heard" and "rejecting the old politics" is nothing more than slogans. its time to ask what are you and your candidate really for?
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.